Questo sito utilizza cookies, anche di terze parti. Per proseguire devi accettare la nostra policy cliccando su “Sì, accetto”.

Patrizia Catellani

Il senno di poi degli elettori: illusioni, delusioni, sorprese.

Bertolotti, M. e Catellani, P. (2018). Il senno di poi degli elettori: illusioni, delusioni, sorprese. In ITANES (a cura di), Vox populi. Il voto ad alta voce del 2018, Il Mulino, Bologna, pp. 225-238. 

Prevedibilità, nessi causali e attribuzione di responsabilità: le inconsce difficoltà del giudicare col “senno di poi”.

Catellani, P. (2018). Prevedibilità, nessi causali e attribuzione di responsabilità: le inconsce difficoltà del giudicare col “senno di poi”. In S. Azzali, U. Morera e G. Rojas Elgueta, (a cura di) Errori cognitivi e arbitrato, Il Mulino, Bologna, pp. 227-248. 

Different frames to reduce red meat intake: The moderating role of self-efficacy.

Bertolotti, M., Carfora, V. & Catellani, P. (2019). Different frames to reduce red meat intake: The moderating role of self-efficacy. Health Communication. 

The effects of counterfactual attacks on the morality and leadership of different professionals.

Bertolotti, M. & Catellani, P. (2018). The effects of counterfactual attacks on the morality and leadership of different professionals. Social Psychology, 49, 154-167.

social-psychology

 

L'articolo all'interno della rivista Social Psychology è ora disponibile online:
Catellani, P. & Bertolotti, M.
The effects of counterfactual attacks on social judgments.

Qui di seguito l’abstract dell’articolo:

Two experiments were conducted to compare the effects of different styles of verbal criticism (factual versus counterfactual) on the perceptions of target, source, and quality of the attack. Counterfactual attacks resulted in more negative overall judgment of the target and ratings of the target’s morality than either factual attacks or no attack. Counterfactual attacks were also rated more positively than factual attacks, and the source of the counterfactual attack was rated as being less biased against the target. Regression analyses confirmed that the observed effect on overall judgment was mediated by the perceived bias of the source. The greater effectiveness of counterfactual attacks was moderated by awareness of prior hostility of the source of the attack towards the target.